have u ever seen that sketch from family guy where they mock loose women? its all these women just clucking** over each other as loudly as possible
yeah i hate sitting next to that at restaurants
shrill drunk women are the worst. no one cares about your gossip shutup and let the rest of us enjoy our meals ffs
** they use chicken squaking sounds for the voiceovers
joy o’s essential mix is great
You’re so pathetically inept that you can’t even see that the problem isn’t with your preference. You’re essentially saying “you haven’t proven you’re a man, therefore you cannot speak for men. However, I [the submitter] am a man, therefore my opinion on what a woman should do with her pubic hair should be heard and respected.” Substitute “pubic hair” with anything else I’d bet you’d have the same point-of-view, which brings us to my point. To men like you, it’s a man’s world and what man wants man gets. I truly could not care less what you prefer, it’s your fucking entitlement that makes my skin crawl.
not that i agree with what Anon said in the slightest
but that response was pretty hyperbolic
"its painful for us as human beings, not as jews, as muslims, or as christians… as human beings" - director of a children’s hospital that was bombed in gaza, stood outside in tears while being interviewed on bbc news
meanwhile that facist pig netanyahu says “we will continue to act aggressively and responsibly, be prepared for a prolonged campaign” (or something, i didnt quite catch it)
how long will these zionist neo-nazis go on their barbaric rampage
You object to the simplified classification of mankind into rich and poor. Of course there is a middle stratum, there is the technical intelligentsia that you have mentioned and among which there are very good and very honest people. Among them there are also dishonest and wicked people, there are all sorts of people among them, But first of all mankind is divided into rich and poor, into property owners and exploited; and to abstract oneself from this fundamental division and from the antagonism between poor and rich means abstracting oneself from the fundamental fact. I do not deny the existence of intermediate middle strata, which either take the side of one or the other of these two conflicting classes, or else take up a neutral or semi-neutral position in this struggle. But, I repeat, to abstract oneself from this fundamental division in society and from the fundamental struggle between the two main classes means ignoring facts. The struggle is going on and will continue. The outcome will be determined by the proletarian class, the working class.